Part of me from me from the tiny nothing that symbolizes my legal knowledge suggests the ads might be a liability. From my understanding though to pursue slander one has to show tangible losses not suggest the other might have gained. But at the same time I wasn't even aware family court was a thing. Which appears to have its own Salem Esq set of rules that make those who are fans of Massachusetts in the 1600s positively giddy.
the last thing I would have suspected is you can tell someone via actions and words that threaten lives and property; to essentially put the lotion on their skin get the hose and then court and then the hose again
I especially would not have suspected that those actions could repeatedly violate ci vil to misdemeanor to felony law well being malicious in nature only for law enforcement to discriminate on a per-party basis and not enforce the laws as the illegal actions create threat to life.
It's a lot to put together even if you know some of the contributing factors or have assumptions suited to that conclusion. It's especially a lot to put together if you've managed 32 years and can count your court appearances on one hand worth of fingers with fingers remaining. Plural. After all compulsory education before during or after the social studies teacher mentioning how brainwashed Korea is I think US students are still being told to stand dogmatically say something along the lines of land of the free with liberty and justice for all? Learning about checks balances and separations of power? Freedoms of association? Free speech? And yes threats should be somewhat separate but to ignore conditionality free speech is dead.
If pigs fly and if for whatever reason it can be externally proven that at the same time I develop the ability to flap my arms and levitate and peer-reviewed study can prove these are related and happening then I'm going to brutally murder you
Well if the court doesn't consider conditionality I suppose yeah I just threatened to murder you. But when we stretch it that far or assume that I'm the level of crazy that could hallucinate that then how do you even reason that I think murder is death not buy you an expensive car?
Next thing missing is context in which something was said and it appears neither is considered
But the point of advertising here is among the laws overlooked and repetitive crimes to harm and terrorize have been mail fraud check fraud theft of physical ID,0 notice lock change eviction with police helping the self-proclaired landlord seize hold threaten and continue to this moment to destroy all assets and personal property. There was also false police reports and what got recorded as DV was my mom trying to push me over a railing aka attempted murder. What I told the relevant police department when I finally managed to get evidence of that recorded was that what I'm looking for is so much as a slap on the wrist or stern warning or what the bar hotline told me to say was unreliable witness on record. I was told if we put that on record we might be liable. This would have been a great time to tell me that an option was an OFP. It appears Minnesota family court has the idea of justice is meant for it first come first serve. This is terrifying in its own right.
The point is if you're following for detail having the funds for any defense... Even if you have them how can you hold on to them if none of you above is enforced when it's in fact a violation of law?
If you look up the reality behind Google adsense it probably never will pay for a defense. This site's primary purpose or intent is should I die from these actions it does what a dead body cannot. The old saying is dead men tell no tales. It costs $13 a year. The ads might realistically pay for that or pay that back. Not at the current level of traffic though.
I would love to produce more quality content and or be able to edit and proofread more. After filing the OFPs Marlene and Paul who happened to be my mom and dad actually the better way is a month after they passed in my manufactured absence Marlene and Paul stole $1,000 plus of equipment from my garage which police again refused to do anything about. As far as I can read that was a felony level theft. It also puts me in a position of limit as to what I even have to type on let alone proofread and edit on.
The police largely causative in the city Marlene and Paul live certain members like to go over verbatim on my parents claims without even asking questions like what would be required. What I mean is officer Hanson on several occasions your parents give you enough was either directly communicated or implied. Okay bro I gave you enough I gave you a week even and $10,000 where is my bridge across the Bering strait? The point I'm trying to make is without context or refusing context it's pretty hard to know what enough is. When overlooking actual legal violations because you were hearsay given a story and these violations might threaten life it becomes almost taunting to claim that anything would justify that. Especially from someone forcing it from a position of power by backing those who commit the potential crimes and/or excusing them because they gave you a hearsay story. In fact it's out of line with the concept of separation of powers as well. it creates a situation where police are playing judge jury and potentially executioner.
Desp ite the terror that says generated in my life and the actual risk I've tried to remain respectful. Partially out of realization that no officer in the nation that I know of or rather no department has a psych eval as a requisite. Partially out of I can put myself in another's position. Partially out of I start with a default level of respect for anyone I communicate with or encounter. That's not the same as deep respect or trust but we're all human. I also understand that job probably isn't easy or safe. The respect I have goes beyond words used I try to do things like visible hands on officer approach and or dome light on if it's night you know things that I can reason would would be potentially fear inducing , risk indicating or lacking in respect otherwise I try to keep out of the set of activities performed.
Which normally that's default for even people without a position of power over me. That said it gets rather hard when someone is ignoring crime after crime that endangers my life and my ability to escape the situation but not only that they're standing there casting personal judgment with a badge on their chest and a gun on their hip.
Then you learn according to LinkedIn they are five years your junior and from a town of about 3500 if I recall. And that might be the only job they've ever had. now this person from that position of power has been ignoring forced labor if not enforcing it.. has the tip of the iceberg and judging you as lesser by somewhat subjectively but I think if rationally externally and without incentive for bias the interactions were viewed it would be pretty objectively looked down on if you were to describe the auctions of officer Hanson. I've read that police are told to check personal bias at the door my subjective opinion his officer Hanson either was busy checking out the door during that speech or decided to check the door.