You maybe assume police won't cover harm or directly harm. Harm more to cover harm by supporting a party causing harm .
The problem is human history shows most people won't hurt other people but the full range of what someone might do or could do is highly likely to happen.
The way we control that is systems in place to punish or make negative consequences for breaking the rules
We've learned even better now you need to have an outside not standing to gain or lose party evaluate if the rules have been broken
we understand the ins-and-outs of that now but there's some evidence like in the Constitution that this was understood for a long time at least on a basic level.
Problem is this isn't applied to the police.
One of the more advanced things we understand now is conditions like narcissistic personality disorder and antisocial personality disorder disable the mechanisms that usually create humans that won't harm other humans unless being harm to themselves.
Those same conditions are associated with people seeking positions of power over others.
Yet when I looked I could not find that a single state had implemented psych evals as a requirement for hiring police.
Which would not be a perfect solution but nothing is. Point isn't give up because nothing is perfect the point is you have to work towards the percentages.
Or if you're making the argument that can't catch em all so don't try apply it to life
It won't be perfect so you might as well end it.
More so if you're making that argument you probably have one of the cluster B disorders diagnosed or otherwise.
When we forget that what you have physical assets are personal property wise off and enables what you can earn money wise either directly or side income that's part of the problem.
Another part of it is most of that is salable back to cash unless the police help separate you from it and destroy it.
We like to assume or a lot of people tend to think the medical field is so advanced these days I'm so close to perfect that that's all you need for anyting but again that's wishful thinking. the reality is most of the people you encounter really do want to help you but there's a lot in between believing that's what they're doing systems that aren't set up to catch error or even look past the first doctors horse fetish.
Ive long told a joke because a few girls I like over the years were into horses. Also because even through puberty or early years I've always been kind of an observer of people and behaviors. That's why I have a true belief that there's no difference between genders and races that's inherent. But the joke was the problem isn't girls that are into horses it's horses that are into girls.
I was blinded potentially by the more serious issue and the doctors are fixated on the horse . Behind the doctor forcing the horse is a metaphor bull
And one of the sources of error is in this metaphor the bulls phalus can be RX kickbacks. I guess the real problem is doctors into the reach-around from pharmacy among others.
But regardless of conjecture medical errors kill 250 thousand Americans a year sometimes more sometimes less.
but everyone wants to assume this couldn't be possibly the ostrich that hides from problems by sticking its head in a hole with its body vulnerable.
The real Terror created here is
The system isn't set up to even look for slavery let alone forced labor human trafficking.
What is known is if somebody's dead they rarely have a voice after.
This is mine
If you're not privy to what I mean by horses ask a doctor about zebras.
I wrote this as a bit of a demonstration that what you know might be limited. If you're not aware something it might mean to you something makes no sense so you might have evaluated me as absolutely nuts draging off and random topics like girls and horses.
But if you had the pre-existing knowledge that doctors are taught here's a list of common conditions it's almost always one of these we're going to call those horses.
Anything else is a zebra. Zebras aren't worth looking for maybe if you've ruled out all of the horses
the thing is profit profitability all of that factors in to whoever taught you that list even if you are in med school or have been again we like to assume that wouldnt happen. But it's not hard to see evidence it might. Big pharma is usually petrol chemical produced other than antibiotics as they were originally discovered. Then you have the fact that the oil family if I recall correctly their foundation established the American medical association.
That's not to say it's all corrupt either what I'm saying is you can't evaluate it like that but there's more than enough evidence that there might be flaws in the methodology that are compounded by human ability to see past it or see the issue and our desire to want to play ostrich instead equals humans killing other humans
And if you didn't understand a few prerequisites ahead of time you can't even see that when I started horses it was in fact tangent and a justified tangent
A lot of cancel culture is probably borderline personality disorder. In totally unrelated conversations to this post I've noted that they freakishly diverted towards personal attacks. One of them justified it tellimg me that when she got a ba in English they taught how to argue effectively and this is what they were using. If that is the case academia is gone as far as ethics go. Or heavily corrupted.
The most common one i get is you just use big words to try to confuse people and sound smart you don't have a point or you don't make any sense.
The same people tend to have an attention span of maybe phone screen worth of text maybe a third of it.
But they will tell you with certainty how evil you are how much of a liar you are even when you support their point but think should be gone about in it slightly different way there's no in between there's nogray there's no way for them to see there's multiple pads to the same destination
Whether or not I survived relatively sure we are murdering freedom
In my evaluation,
Several weapons are at play but applied psychology is definitely one of them
And why wouldn't it be? Is it so hard to conceive that public relations or propaganda would not have a crossover where someone attempted to apply what's known about psychological conditions and human psychology?
I'm sure he's not the only player
But the guy who wrote the book propaganda
Was also Sigmund Freud's nephew. He died in 1995 at a hundred and three.
Crystalizing public opinion.
What I'm about to say is a meta-analysis for sure but take it as you want
If you read in-depth on narcissistic personality disorder you often come across a concept that when it clicks into a full disorder parts fully-formed process is refered to as crystallization